Generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini have revolutionised how professionals work with information. Yet their effectiveness depends entirely on how you communicate with them. The quality of the input determines the quality of the output. This practice — crafting clear, structured, and context-rich instructions for AI — is known as prompt engineering.
For accounting professionals, prompt engineering is not a technical skill but a new form of professional communication. It is about asking precise questions, defining expectations, and providing relevant context — just as you would when briefing a colleague or auditor.

When used correctly, prompt engineering transforms AI tools into capable assistants that can analyse data, draft commentary, interpret policy, or even simulate decision scenarios. The goal is not just to get an answer, but to get the right answer, in the right tone, with the right depth for business use.
Generative AI models do not “know” facts in the traditional sense. They generate responses by predicting the most likely sequence of words based on patterns they have learned from data. The model relies entirely on the context you give it.
This means vague questions such as “Explain accounting” produce vague answers. But a specific question such as “Explain how IFRS 16 impacts the accounting for leases in the retail industry, using a practical example” produces a far more relevant response.
A well-crafted prompt acts as both a question and a set of instructions. It defines the role of the AI, the task, the context, and the expected format of the response.
Start by assigning a role to the AI so that it responds from an appropriate perspective. For instance:
“You are an experienced chartered accountant specialising in Australian accounting standards.”
This simple line changes how the AI frames its reasoning. The model will filter its output through the lens of that professional identity, increasing relevance and tone accuracy.
In accounting contexts, roles could include:
Financial Controller
Internal Auditor
Tax Consultant
Management Accountant
Business Analyst
Example:
“You are a senior financial analyst preparing commentary for the CFO. Review the following income statement and summarise the key variances using professional accounting language.”
This immediately orients the AI to produce structured and formal analysis suitable for reporting purposes.

Be explicit about what you want the AI to do. Common task types for accounting professionals include:
Summarising financial or regulatory documents
Drafting professional communication (emails, memos, or management reports)
Analysing trends in numerical data
Comparing accounting standards or policies
Explaining concepts in simple terms for non-financial audiences
Example:
“Summarise this IFRS 9 section in three paragraphs that explain its impact on loan provisioning for small banks.”
The clearer your task, the more focused the output.
Context provides background; constraints limit scope. Together, they prevent irrelevant or overly general responses.
For instance, providing the financial year, the type of company, or the audience can dramatically improve results.
Example:
“Prepare a 200-word commentary on the 2024 financial results of an Australian manufacturing company. Assume the report is for the board of directors. Emphasise gross margin trends and working capital management.”
This prompt tells the AI what to analyse, how long to write, and who the audience is — ensuring tone and content alignment.
Always specify how you want the response presented — paragraph summary, bullet points, table, or executive brief.
Example:
“Generate a three-paragraph executive summary followed by a short table comparing last year’s and this year’s key ratios.”
Format instructions help AI produce outputs that fit directly into your workflow, saving editing time.
A simple way to remember how to write effective prompts is the R-T-C-F Framework:
R – Role: Who should the AI be?
T – Task: What exactly should it do?
C – Context: What background or details should it consider?
F – Format: How should the answer be structured?
Example Prompt Using RTCF:
“You are an internal auditor (R). Review the following list of procurement transactions and identify potential red flags or unusual patterns (T). The transactions relate to a government-funded construction project under tight compliance rules (C). Present your findings in a short report format with headings and summary observations (F).”
This structured approach mirrors professional writing and ensures business-grade outputs.
Encourage the AI to explain its reasoning rather than jump to conclusions. This improves transparency and allows you to validate its logic.
Example:
“Explain step-by-step how to calculate deferred tax under AASB 112 using this example: a $10,000 temporary difference between accounting and tax depreciation.”
The AI will produce a structured explanation of reasoning — useful for training, audit documentation, or peer review.
Provide examples of the kind of output you expect. AI learns from your examples within the same session.
Example:
“Here is an example of how I want a variance commentary written:
‘Revenue increased by 8% due to higher sales volumes, while cost of goods sold rose proportionally, resulting in stable gross margin.’
Now write similar commentary for this P&L statement.”
By showing format and tone, you anchor the AI’s output style to professional accounting language.
You can ask the AI to simulate professional interactions, such as a meeting, client consultation, or stakeholder interview. This is powerful for preparing reports or communication scenarios.
Example:
“Act as a client CFO who is concerned about audit delays. Respond to my explanations professionally, and help me practise handling objections.”
These simulations enhance soft skills and help professionals prepare for real-world interactions.
AI performs best when given enough background to understand the full picture. Instead of asking, “How can AI help auditors?”, provide context:
“We are a mid-sized audit firm with 25 staff. Our clients are small manufacturing companies. What are five ways we can use AI tools to improve audit efficiency and documentation quality?”
Specific details lead to tailored recommendations instead of generic advice.
Treat AI conversations as collaborative drafting rather than one-time queries. Begin with a general prompt, review the output, then refine your instructions based on what you receive.
Example:
“Summarise the key points from this client’s management report.”
“Now make it more concise for inclusion in a board presentation.”
“Add a closing statement that recommends next steps.”
This iterative method mirrors professional review processes and produces more polished results.
Prompt:
“You are a financial analyst. Summarise the key financial results from the following P&L statement for management reporting. Focus on revenue, cost trends, and profitability. Present the summary as a formal paragraph suitable for a board report.”
Outcome:
A concise, professional summary highlighting key movements and ratios, ready to paste into a financial commentary.
Prompt:
“As an external auditor, prepare a sample control-testing checklist for payroll processes. Include key risks, control objectives, and test procedures.”
Outcome:
AI generates a structured list resembling audit workpaper templates, saving significant setup time.
Prompt:
“Explain IFRS 15 revenue recognition in simple language for a junior accountant. Use an example of a software subscription business and include journal entries for revenue deferral.”
Outcome:
A teaching-style explanation bridging technical standards with practical examples.
Prompt:
“Draft an email to a client explaining why their financial statements are delayed. Keep the tone polite, professional, and reassuring. Include a short apology and confirm the new completion date.”
Outcome:
A complete draft email suitable for client communication with correct business tone.
Prompt:
“Review the following Excel export showing monthly expenses for 2023. Identify any unusual patterns or anomalies. Provide a short explanation of potential causes.”
Outcome:
AI highlights trends such as seasonal fluctuations or unexpected expense spikes, providing hypotheses for further review.
Tailor the language for the intended reader. Accounting professionals often need to explain information to non-financial stakeholders.
Prompt Example:
“Summarise this financial report for a marketing manager who does not have an accounting background.”
Use word counts, tone descriptors, or formatting instructions to fit business documents.
Prompt Example:
“Write a 150-word summary in a formal tone for inclusion in the annual report.”
Tell the AI why the task matters. This helps it align tone and depth.
Prompt Example:
“You are advising a CFO preparing for a board meeting. Provide concise talking points highlighting financial performance and key risks.”
Prompt engineering also involves ethical responsibility. When using AI for professional tasks:
Avoid sharing confidential client or financial data with public AI systems.
Review outputs critically for factual accuracy.
Disclose AI assistance when required by your organisation’s policies.
Ensure tone and wording reflect professional judgment, not unverified conclusions.
AI is a collaborator, not an authority. The accountant remains responsible for the final interpretation and decision.
Mastering prompt engineering is not about memorising formulas; it is about thinking clearly and communicating precisely. It strengthens skills accountants already possess — analytical reasoning, concise writing, and professional scepticism.
Over time, prompt engineering will become as essential as spreadsheet literacy. Those who understand how to communicate with AI effectively will enjoy substantial productivity advantages and creative flexibility in how they deliver value.
As accounting moves further into the age of intelligent systems, the ability to “speak to the machine” with clarity, purpose, and professionalism will define the next generation of finance leaders.